Mathematics of Athletics Track Marking

 INTRODUCTION

I became familiar with this topic after joining the Middle East Technical University (METU) Athletics Team. Our campus had a 6-lane, 400-meter rubber track, but it lacked any standard markings—just lane lines and a finish line. As a result, it was unsuitable for both training with accurate time measurements and hosting official track meets.

Initially, we submitted a request through the university's Sports Directorate to have the track properly marked. However, the university neither had the qualified staff for the technical work nor the budget to outsource the job. All they could offer us were basic supplies like paint, brushes, and measuring tapes.

So, I took on the task of calculating and designing the necessary markings myself. Then, as the Athletics Team, we manually painted and marked the entire track at the university stadium. While there are official blueprints available for standard track markings, the METU stadium’s non-standard layout made them unusable. This left us no choice but to compute and determine all line positions from scratch.

Track and field is arguably the fairest of all sports. One of the key reasons for this fairness is its heavy reliance on precise measurement. In running events especially, it is essential to ensure that every athlete runs exactly the same distance, even if their paths differ. This is achieved through careful placement of start lines, tailored to each lane.

STAGGERED STARTS

Marking the start line for the 100-meter dash is straightforward—simply draw a line parallel to the finish line, exactly 100 meters behind it. But things get more interesting with events like the 200 meters and 800 meters.

If you’ve ever watched a 200-meter race, you’ve probably noticed that athletes don’t start side by side. This is called a staggered start, and it's used to ensure that each runner covers precisely 200 meters. The race includes a curved section followed by the home straight, and the curvature is what introduces complexity. Because running in the outer lanes means covering more ground over the curve, the start positions for those lanes must be placed progressively further ahead than the inner ones. Determining how much further involves applying some clever differential geometry.

THEOREM:

• A curve $L(t),\; and\; another\; curve\; M$$(t)$ offset from it at a constant perpendicular distance $w$.

• At every point on $M(t)$, the shortest distance to $L(t)\; is$$w$, meaning $M$ is a parallel (or offset) curve to $L(t)$.

• $\alpha$ is the total change in tangent direction of $M(\mathrm{t)\; from\; start\; to\; end.}$

• $S_1=\text{length of }\mathrm{L, }$$S_2=\text{length of M.}$

Then:

$$S_2-S_1=w\alpha$$

Where $\alpha$ is in radians.

PROOF:

Let the original curve $L(t)\; be\; parameterized\; by\; arc\; length$$s$, so $\mathrm{\parallel }{L}^{\mathrm{\prime }}(s)\mathrm{\parallel }=\mathrm{1.\; The\; offset\; curve }$$M(s)$ at distance $w$ is given by:

$$M(s)=L(s)+w\cdot \mathbf{n}(s)$$

Where:

• $\mathbf{n}(s)$ is the unit normal vector to the curve $L$ at point $s$

• $w$ is the signed offset distance (positive if offset is to the left of motion direction)

Differentiate $M(s)$:

$$M'(s) = L'(s) + w \cdot \mathbf{n}'(s)$$

But in planar curves, the Frenet–Serret formulas give:

$$\mathbf{n}'(s) = -\kappa(s) \cdot \mathbf{t}(s)$$

where $\kappa(s)$ is the curvature, and $\mathbf{t}(s)=L^{\mathrm{\prime }}(\mathrm{s)is\; the\; unit\; tangent.}$

So:

$$M'(s) = \mathbf{t}(s) - w \kappa(s) \cdot \mathbf{t}(s) = (1 - w \kappa(s)) \cdot \mathbf{t}(s)$$

So the speed of $M(s)$ is:

$$\mathrm{\parallel }{M}^{\mathrm{\prime }}(s)\mathrm{\parallel }=\mathrm{\mid }1-w\kappa (s)\mathrm{\mid }$$

The length of $M$ is:

$$S_2 = \int_0^{S_1} \|M'(s)\| \, ds = \int_0^{S_1} |1 - w \kappa(s)| \, ds$$

Assume $w$ is small enough so $1-w\kappa (s)>\mathrm{0,\; then:}$

$$S_2 = \int_0^{S_1} (1 - w \kappa(s)) \, ds = S_1 - w \int_0^{S_1} \kappa(s) \, ds$$

But:

$$\int_0^{S_1} \kappa(s) \, ds = \alpha$$

because total curvature is the total turning angle of the tangent, i.e. the angle $\alpha$ between the two tangent vectors.

So:

$$S_2 = S_1 - w \alpha \quad \Rightarrow \quad S_1 = S_2 - w \alpha$$

CONCLUSION: The stagger in a 200-meter race arises from the fact that the first half of the race is run on a curve rather than a straight. For the innermost lane (Lane 1), the rotation in this curved section corresponds to an angle of π radians.

If the 200-meter start line were placed straight across all lanes—like the 100-meter start line—then each outer lane would require an additional $\pi w$ meters of distance to cover the wider arc, where:

• $w$ is the lane width

• $\pi$ is the angular measure in radians

• $n$ is the lane number (with the innermost lane being $n = 1$)

To ensure all athletes run exactly 200 meters, each start line must be shifted forward (i.e., staggered) relative to this hypothetical straight start line. The required stagger for lane $n$ is given by the formula:

Δn​=(n−1)⋅π⋅w

Where:

• $\Delta_n$ is the stagger (in meters) for lane $n$
  

• $w = 1.22 \, \text{m}$ on standard WA tracks, or $w = 1.17 \, \text{m}$ for the METU stadium

If the bend of a track was a perfect semi-circle, which is the case for Olympic-standard tracks, it would be much easier to work out the path difference by P = πr. But as can be seen on the aerial image, METU Stadium's bend is far from a perfect semicircle, hence we needed the theorem to know that the formula holds for any curve. Another reason is that it is much practical to know the excess path and draw the starts accordingly, rather than measuring 100m for each line from 100m start all the way up to 200m start.

Using $w = 1.17 \, \text{m}$, the staggers for the 200-meter start are:

Lane	Stagger $\Delta_n$ (m)
1	+0.0000 m
2	+3.8327 m
3	+7.6655 m
4	+11.4982 m
5	+15.3310 m
6	+19.1637 m

In the 400-meter race, athletes complete two curves resulting in a full $360^\circ$ rotation or $2\pi$ radians. This total angular difference causes the need for staggered starts, just like in the 200-meter race, but doubled.

The stagger formula becomes:

$${\mathrm{\Delta }}_n=(n-1)\cdot 2\pi \cdot w$$

So, the staggers for each lane are:

Lane	Stagger $\Delta_n$ (m)
1	+0.0000 m
2	+7.6655 m
3	+15.3310 m
4	+22.9965 m
5	+30.6619 m
6	+38.3274 m

WATERFALL STARTS

Not every race is run in lanes. From 1500 m up to 10,000 m, although the athletes start side by side, they are required to converge to the first lane, since it provides the shortest distance around the track. But if the start line for a 3000 m race were a straight line, athletes in the outer positions would have to cover more distance to reach the first lane. To prevent this unfairness, the start curve of those races is designed in a very specific way, ensuring that any athlete who starts on the curve and runs the shortest legal path ends up covering exactly the same total distance.

But how is that line calculated?

Assume that you are an athlete (represented by the red dot) and you're going to run counterclockwise around the black line. This means you will move downward on the screen. If you were already tangent to the black line, you would simply follow it without deviating.

However, since you’re not tangent, you must find a path that adds the least possible extra distance before joining the black line. The solution is clear: follow a straight line that is tangent to the curve, and once you intersect it, continue along the black line.

This pattern applies to all points on a waterfall start line. Wherever you begin, if you first run along a straight line tangent to the curve, then continue along the first lane, the total distance you cover will be the same as everyone else. This is the fundamental principle upon which the design of waterfall start lines are based.

Now to make the parametrization clearer, let us image that we have a rope (represented by blue dashed line) of length 100m and one end is anchored at the innermost part of 100m start (lowermost part of the arc). We first wrap it around the innermost part of track (represented by black line) clockwise. Then the other end must coincide 200m start (uppermost part of the arc).

Now we slowly unwrap the rope by keeping it fastened:

Since the rope is kept fastened, it is guaranteed that it provides the shortest distance between the two ends. Also the length is 100m behind 100m start, which coincides 3000m and 5000m starts. Therefore, the mark that the upper end leaves (represented by green dotted line) as we unwrap the rope, is the curve of 3000m/5000m start; because wherever on that curve, the athlete following the shortest path always ends up covering 100m when they cross the 100m start, hence all cover 3000/5000m after 7.5/12.5 laps.

Now let us dig in and try to formally define the curve. First, let s be our independent variable that defines the path from 100m start to the point where the straight part of the rope meets the innermost part of the track, that is, where the straight part of the rope is tangent to the black curve. Since the total length of the rope is 100m, the straight part turns out to be 100m-s.

Let the black curve be parametrically defined by:

For a perfect semicircle, it would be:

But it might be something as, which is the case for METU track, so let us just leave it as it is.

The slope at the tangent point is defined by:

We have (100m - s) of rope left that must follow the slope m, after point C(s). Let the angle that the straight part of the rope makes with the x-axis be α. The tangent of the angle is m. The cosine and sine are:

   

We are already only interested in the part where m is positive, so let us just omit the negative roots. So the coordinates for the waterfall start are:

Substituting the necessary parts:

*** TO BE CONTINUED ***